Gender, Shopping, Transparency, Trends, Uncategorized

Brands And Retailers Take A Stand On The “Pink Tax”

The Pink Tax is a business practice where women pay more for the same goods and services as men.

USA Today reports that retailers charge:

  • Four percent more for girl’s clothing;
  • Seven percent more for girl’s toys and accessories;
  • Eight percent more for women’s clothing; and
  • 13 percent more for women’s personal care products.

And feminine health products, an absolute necessity, is taxed.  States and brands are changing the system and bring light to the issue.

  • In 2016, a State of New York consumer study cited that personal products with female-oriented packaging (read: pink) cost up to 13% more than male-oriented ones (read: blue) despite being the same dosage and quantity.  The result is NYS effectively ended the tampon tax in 2016 indicating they are not luxury items.
  • In 2016, California introduced a bill that would outlaw gender-based pricing.
  • Billie, a woman-oriented shaving company, does not charge more for feminine items.
  • Boxed.com publicly refuted the pink tax and now absorbs the additional costs of women’s goods instead of passing excess charges along to female consumers.
  • Burger King called out the Pink Tax in this example of charging 2.39 more for “Chick Fries” served in a pink box.

BurgerKingPinkTax

Pink Tax Makes Women Pay More – USAToday

Retailers Standing Out Vetoing The Pink Tax – RetailWire

NYS Study of Gender Pricing – NYC.gov

Burger King Chick Tax YouTube